Topic: Education

  • The High Returns of Educated, Empowered Girls A Social Return on Investment Evaluation of the Time + Tide Foundation’s Girls Clubs in Mfuwe, Zambia

    The High Returns of Educated, Empowered Girls A Social Return on Investment Evaluation of the Time + Tide Foundation’s Girls Clubs in Mfuwe, Zambia

    The Time + Tide Foundation launched a Girls Club programme in the rural area of Mfuwe in the Eastern Province of Zambia in 2015 after realizing how socially and academically ill-equipped female students were to transition from primary school into high school. Specifically, girls appeared to lack knowledge and confidence with the English language and have limited (if any) understanding of their sexual health rights and choices. Additionally, the Time + Tide Foundation learned that girls in this rural area of Zambia had an ingrained, patriarchal perspective on gender norms and were subject to cultural practices that contributed to their low levels of confidence and decision-making abilities. In response to this information, the Time + Tide Foundation formed extracurricular Girls Clubs in 2015 for girls in the final years of primary school, with a focus on girls who were considered to be at risk of either dropping out of primary school or not advancing to secondary school. These clubs have continued for nearly eight years and serve as safe, female-only spaces, through which the girls receive supplementary academic lessons, with a heavy focus on English, information on sexual and reproductive health and participate in activities that build their self-esteem levels.

    All of the girls enrolled in the clubs face significant familial, social and/or academic hardship, and the vast majority live at or below the poverty line (living on less than $2 USD per day), with average family sizes of seven individuals. Teachers recommend girls for the club whom they feel to be at risk of dropping out of school, and the Time + Tide Foundation (TTF) then assesses these girls through interviews as well as review of their transcripts and English language ability. The clubs in Mfuwe are held at two primary schools (Yosefe Primary School and Matula Primary School) in two separate chiefdoms (Kakumbi Chiefdom and Mnkhanya Chiefdom), approximately 20 km apart. The girls in the clubs come from over 30 different villages that are within the catchment areas of these schools, traveling distances of up to 5 km daily by foot or bicycle. The majority of girls live in households with no wage earners (informal income generation) and have mothers who did not finish primary or high school.

    In the year 2022, the Girls Clubs in Mfuwe had 53 participants: 22 girls in Grade 5, 28 girls in Grade 6 and 3 girls in Grade 7, which is the final year of primary school in Zambia. While these girls comprise the direct beneficiaries of the programme, over the years the TTF has received reports of the indirect ways in which the programme creates value: anecdotes of other students absorbing information from the club second hand, mothers changing their attitudes towards their daughters and teachers learning new ways to engage female students. Since 2020, the TTF has experimented with a couple of different social return on investment (SROI) methodologies in order to report back to donors on the social value created through their philanthropic investments, and to understand the most valuable aspects of its programming. In 2022, the organisation came across Social Value International (SVI) and its stakeholder-centred approach to analysing SROI. Three of the TTF senior team members completed the Online Social Value & SROI Accredited Practitioner Training Course in 2022 and obtained their Level One Social Value Association qualifications. In 2023, these TTF Social Value Associates undertook SROI assessments of the organization’s core programmes with support from Think Impact, an Australian social impact consulting, project management and capacity building firm.

    The purpose of these SROIs is to:

    1. understand where the most value is created per programme from the lens of stakeholders;
    2. report back to donors on the social returns of their donations; and
    3. for the associates to attain the Level Two Accredited Practitioner qualification and thereafter incorporate SROI analyses into the organisation’s monitoring and evaluation protocols

    Each programme is being analysed with the evaluative approach over the year of 2022 as a snapshot in time: analysing the total value experienced by stakeholders involved over the calendar year of 2022 against all of the investment relevant to those stakeholders, which for this assessment spans a period of three years (2020-2022). This report presents the results of the SROI, which include all of the social value created for the 2022 stakeholders involved in or affected by the two Girls Clubs in Mfuwe, Zambia. For some of these stakeholders, those who have interacted with the programme since 2020, this social value has been cumulative over two to three years (2020-2022), which has been accounted for in the investment calculations. 

    Scope

    The Girls Clubs under evaluation occur in two primary schools in two locations in Mfuwe, Zambia. The first is at Yosefe Primary School, located in the Kakumbi Chiefdom of Mfuwe, and the second is at Matula Primary School, located in the Mnkhanya Chiefdom of Mfuwe. Both chiefdoms form part of the larger Mambwe District, in the Eastern Province of Zambia. The assessment takes a ‘snapshot in time’ approach and includes the value experienced by the 2022 stakeholders over the entirety of their interaction with the Girls Clubs. The 2022 stakeholders comprised groups or individuals who interacted with the Girls Clubs for different amounts of time, specifically one to three years, with the total, cumulative value experienced by each stakeholder group assessed. This ‘snapshot in time’ approach was taken because it was deemed too challenging to ask the stakeholders to separate the value by year of involvement, and it was deemed too subjective for the practitioner to try to make these professional judgements. Instead, the investment figures include amounts from prior years (2020 and 2021) that were relevant to the 2022 stakeholders and all of the investment from the year 2022. The investment from prior years was calculated by dividing total cost of the programme per year by number of girls enrolled each year to determine cost per female student per year, and then multiplying that cost per student by the number of 2022 beneficiaries who were enrolled in those prior years. The same methodology was used to determine the portion of the organisation’s administrative costs applicable to Girls Clubs in prior years (analyzing cost per beneficiary per year and multiplying by the number of relevant 2022 stakeholders, those who were involved in prior years). The in-kind support for the meeting venue was included for all three years, and the monetary value of the mentorship hours from the donor was included for all three years so as to accurately represent the investment required for the full value experienced by the mentor stakeholder group.  

  • Social Return on Investment Evaluation Report Mencap’s Supported Internship programme 2021 – 2022

    Social Return on Investment Evaluation Report Mencap’s Supported Internship programme 2021 – 2022

    Executive Summary

    This report presents an evaluation of social return, based on the 2021/2022 cohort engaged in the Mencap’s Supported Internship (SI) programme. It builds on the previous work undertaken to produce a forecast of the impact of the 2020/21 cohort.

    The evaluation was constructed with information from a number of processes:

    • A Literature Review to identify material outcomes and stakeholders
    • Engagement with a Sounding Board including ex-learners from the Mencap Supported Internship programme to guide the analysis
    • Interviews with learners, parents, referral agencies and Local Authorities and employers
    • Undertaking deep dives at two of Mencap’s Supported Internship projects
    • Development of an overall Theory of Change and a chain of outcomes for learners
    • Data collection from Mencap’s review documentation used with learners
    • Determining valuations based on undertaking the Values Game with learners
    • Creation of a value map to present the findings
    • Calculation of the Social Return on Investment ratio.

    This evaluation follows the previous forecast SROI process undertaken with the 2020/21 learner cohort, which yielded an SROI ratio of 2.35, with a range between £2 and £3. It was concluded that this ratio was considered to likely to be an underestimate. This was a result of the limitations imposed on delivery of the programme, the research and the stakeholder engagement due to Covid 19 measures. Secondly, there were limitations on the evidence which could be derived from Mencap’s records to support some of the outcomes. Mencap undertook a revision of their paperwork on the basis of recommendations made.

    Hence the second phase of the research reported here, concentrated on the 2021/22 cohort where the programme retuned to more normalised programme of delivery and as a result of which the research could also include more direct connection with stakeholders. The issues of data gaps could be largely resolved, therefore a more realistic and accurate assessment of social value could be determined. The calculations yielded an SROI ratio of 3.22, with a range between £1.61 and £4.83 returned for every £1 invested in the Supported Internship programme.

    Mencap’s Supported Internship programme overview

    The Supported Internship (SI) programme is one of Mencap’s ‘Three Ships’ skills and employability programme components, alongside Traineeships and Apprenticeships. The overall aim is to help young people (16-24) with learning disabilities and young people with autism to get paid employment and to thrive in a job.

    Each year, Mencap’s employment support programmes help over 1,000 people with a learning disability to develop employability skills, undertake personal skills development and then gain paid employment. Mencap is the largest multi-site provider of Supported Internships and the 6th largest overall in the UK. In 2020/2021 Mencap delivered supported Internships across 11 project locations in England, with 10 locations in the following year.

    In 2021/2022 the programme was further extended through the introduction of a Study Programme, in recognition of the fact that many people who had been referred to the SI programme were too far away from the labour market to benefit from a programme lasting only one year. Learners on the study programme therefore had the opportunity to engage in a programme of classroom learning for up to two years, before moving onto the SI programme to help develop their employability skills and competencies.

    Mencap’s SI delivery includes classroom group training, one-to-one support from tutors and job coaches, and individualised work placements with employers. The programme period is in academic years, recruiting learners each autumn. The programme gives approx. 600 hours input for each learner, normally 300 hours of classroom delivery and 300 hours on work placement (s).

    Generally speaking, employer placements start towards the end of the year or early in the New Year. Mencap has access to a wide range of employers from many sectors, with a broad range of employee sizes. There were a number of national and local hospitality providers, but there were also care homes, garden centres, supermarkets, charity shops and NHS employers.

    In 2021/2022, 161 young people with learning disabilities and autism were recruited to the programme and 144 completed the programme.

    During the Evaluation Phase of the research in 2022, Mencap’s employment programmes were inspected by OFSTED, with an overall grade of Requires Improvement. The SI programme is funded by the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) and Local Authority contributions to support the implementation of Education Health and Care Plans. These Plans set out what the Local Authorities’ expectations are for each learner on the SI programme, and the outcomes they expect the programme to deliver.

  • BB2C High School Internship Program

    BB2C High School Internship Program

    “In Appalachian Ohio, a grassroots group of citizens across industry sectors have convened to use community assets to create solutions impacting multiple parts of the community system, thus attempting to solve complex rural problems in innovative ways. One intermediary organization, Building Bridges to Careers (BB2C), has implemented community and career connected learning programs as a way to solve
    problems threatening rural community viability through engaging multiple community stakeholders including the community’s youth.”In Appalachian Ohio, a grassroots group of citizens across industry sectors have convened to use community assets to create solutions impacting multiple parts of the community system, thus attempting to solve complex rural problems in innovative ways. One intermediary organization, Building Bridges to Careers (BB2C), has implemented community and career connected learning programs as a way to solve problems threatening rural community viability through engaging multiple community stakeholders including the community’s youth.

    Using focus groups and survey methods, this study investigated the contributions and the impact of stakeholders of one community and career connected learning program: high school internships. The place-based, cross-sector, bidirectional interactions facilitated by community and career connected learning created a learning ecosystem through the high school internship program; a complex system with many stakeholders and impacts. Using Social Return on Investment (SROI) to quantify impact within
    the learning ecosystem to communicate and maximize change afforded BB2C the opportunity to capture impact to multiple stakeholder groups in the voice of those stakeholders, to make decisions around impact, and to communicate impact to diverse audiences.”

  • Social Impact Assessment Report on the Idea Maker Program

    Social Impact Assessment Report on the Idea Maker Program

    Idea Maker Program is a social innovation project organised by Idea Maker HK to train underprivileged youth to become tutors to educate children about STEM knowledge. Part of their program will be especially organised for underprivileged children through collaboration with social service organisations in Hong Kong.

    This report is to evaluate the social impact of the self-financing part of the Idea Maker Program generated by Idea Maker HK from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021 for their management’s understanding of the impact of the program.

    We adopted the Social Value Analysis methodology according to “A Guide to Social Return on Investment” (2012 edition) and used the “eight principles” as guiding principles throughout the assessment process.

    Through the assessment process, we concluded that the SROI of the project is 2.2, ranging from 1.3 to 3.2. In other words, Idea Maker HK invested HK$645,000 in the program and generated around HK$1.4 million in social and financial return, ranging from HK$ 856,657 to HK$ 2,093,615. The average impact score for the stakeholders is 3.9 on a 0-10 scale, showing a medium impact for the stakeholders on average.

  • Social Value at Universities: Policy and Practice Guidance

    Social Value at Universities: Policy and Practice Guidance

    Universities globally can be major hubs of social and economic activity which drive change in society. We know that they can create multiple and diverse routes into employment, can have significant purchasing power which can inform standards across supply chains, can create learning opportunities which directly nourish and enrich local communities, and can deliver research and innovation which impact health for the better.


    However, the measurable difference these make to lives – and how universities and the funding bodies account for this impact – is still unknown. We created the Global Symposia for Social Value at Universities in 2022, as a way to accelerate the movement. Over 130 joined from 12 countries to contribute to the analysis, from different disciplines such as health, arts, environmental sciences, alongside private, public and third sector stakeholders.


    There were two symposiums. The first was related to understanding policy and practice across disciplines at universities; the second was focused on one of the biggest sectors, business and management studies.
    This report presents the findings from both symposiums from the perspective of different stakeholders:


    1. what is currently being done that is valued
    2. recommendations for improvement


    The Global Symposia at Universities 2022 was co-hosted between Social Value UK and Liverpool John Moores University, the British Academy of Management (Sustainable and Responsible Business SIG), Principles for Responsible Management Education (Working Group on Poverty), University Vocational Awards Council, Social Value International, The Academy of Business in Society, American International Accreditation Association for Schools and Colleges, and the National Society for Experiential Education.

    Supported by Liverpool John Moores University’s Quality Research Funds.

  • Creating Social Value Through Access to Digital Education for Marginalized Schools – Pro Futuro Program Pilot Sites in the Philippines

    Creating Social Value Through Access to Digital Education for Marginalized Schools – Pro Futuro Program Pilot Sites in the Philippines

    “The ProFuturo Program is a partnership between Ayala Foundation, Inc. (AFI) and Fundacion ProFuturo through a Master Collaboration Agreement signed in 2017 with the Department of Education (DEPED) Mindoro, Marinduque, Romblon, Palawan (MIMAROPA) Regional Office. The project aims to provide digital mobile classroom support to elementary school teachers and students with the goal of helping ensure quality elementary education. The digital mobile classroom is composed of three major components such as provision of devices and Internet connectivity, education platform and learning contents, and training and mentoring for teachers. Devices include tablets for students, laptops with software and router for teachers and mini projector for the class. Learning contents covers linguistics, mathematics, sciences, technology, values, and life skills.

    The pilot implementation of ProFuturo was in two Ayala Foundation community development sites in El Nido, Palawan and Puerto Galera, Occidental Mindoro, both located in the MIMAROPA Region. AFI measured the Social Return on Investment (SROI) of this Pilot implementation covering 2018 2020. SROI is a framework for measuring social value. It aims to reduce inequality, environmental degradation, and improve wellbeing by accounting social, environmental, and economic costs and benefits (The SROI Guide, 2012).

    The objective of the analysis is to investigate the benefits of ProFuturo to stakeholders and use the result to improve implementation of the program.”

  • Doroob Scholarship Program in Kenya 2017-2019

    Doroob Scholarship Program in Kenya 2017-2019

    This report is an evaluation of the Doroob Scholarship Program in Kenya for the years 2017 to end of 2019 and assesses the social impact that the project has generated for its key stakeholders during this period.
    The Scholarship is fully focused on nurturing gifted students, and this is the baseline used in developing this report. The stakeholders are at the forefront of coming up with, confirming and verifying the final outcomes and based on their opinions

    The program has also shown that despite all outcomes being important for all the main stakeholders, there is a great value placed beyond academic performance and the below from a scholarship recipient says it best on our efforts and the vision we have for it:

    It actually improved my life and my and how I think. There are actually people around who are ready to help. Ready to encourage you in whatever you are doing. It enhances your goals and there are high chances of you pursuing your career.

    Other key findings include students placing a premium value in their aspirations and parents along the lines of security and ability to provide better education for their other children.”

  • Social Return on Investment Evaluation Report of Rural Up Program

    Social Return on Investment Evaluation Report of Rural Up Program

    Rural Up Program was launched in 2011 for rural development. The program is designed to cultivate students and rural communities for co-creation, and give them opportunities to solve real problems by putting their own ideas into practice.

    Through this program, students become practitioner in rural villages for two months who can observe the question behind question, apply essential methods, lead multi-disciplinary teams to address challenges, communicate efficiently and effectively, and implement sustainable approaches that enhance rural development.

    The program has been held eight times as of 2018, with many student teams participating every year. The scope of this evaluation is the eighth Rural Up program. This study adopts the SROI methodology to review the social impact of the eighth Rural Up from March 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018. Following stakeholder engagement, the key stakeholders of the program were found to be students, the Soil & Water Conservation Bureau (SWCB) and communities. The benefits of the program’s impact for the students were that they indeed absorbed relevant knowledge about farming/fishing village communities and that they began to think about the possibility of planning their careers in these communities. The organizer, Soil and Water Conservation Bureau, was able to get great public recognition via this program. From rural communities’ perspective, the execution of students’ creativity and ideas did change the villages on environment, community cohesion, community prestige  and favorable image.”

  • Home Run Readers Social Return on Investment (SROI) Evaluation Report

    Home Run Readers Social Return on Investment (SROI) Evaluation Report

    The CTBC and NLPI intend to encourage the public to read more and enjoy baseball. By organizing a variety of “Reading × Baseball” activities, it can help children cultivate their interest in reading and sports from an early age, and at the same time, parents and children are encouraged to read together. In the long run, through Home Run Readers, we will create a new model of the “Reading x Baseball” civil–military alliance, integrate sports and book resources, and expand cooperation among varied fields and influences. Such achievements will help not only improve the reading and sports atmosphere for all people,but also cultivate the next Taiwanese generation as happy and intelligent sports enthusiasts.

    This report evaluates Home Run Readers activities held from 2016 to 2020 (a total of 5 years).

  • Social Return on Investment Report of Dandelion Character Class

    Social Return on Investment Report of Dandelion Character Class

    Dandelion Character Class helps disadvantaged students in the Agape Care Associations Sanxia Class and Yingge Class by offering the Dandelion Character Class every other week. Through storytelling and DIY courses, students are brought into the story and put themselves in others shoes, which brings out character education to help students grow in life.

    The purpose of Dandelion Hope Foundation’s release of this report is to evaluate project results, document and thank relevant participants for their past efforts, to thank supporters, donators, and strategic partners. We will provide the valuable opinions found in this report to the board of directors and project managers for reference, so as to optimize future management strategies and maximize the value of resources.

  • Teachers Communities SROI Evaluation Report

    Teachers Communities SROI Evaluation Report

    The report presents the first Social Return on Investment evaluation analysis of the “Teachers Communities” (tr. Öğretmen Toplulukları”) programme implemented by KODA (Köy Okulları Değişim Ağı Rural Schools Change Network) in Harran and Diyarbakir in 2019/2020 school year. As it is the first evaluation analysis, the main aim was to develop the framework for future systematic data collection. The findings of the analysis will be used for internal management purposes.

    The analysis was conducted according to the SROI methodology Social Value Principles and related standards. The analysis resulted in calculating the ratio of the social value created per amount of investment as 2,75.