Tag: Social Value Act

  • Is your workplace a fair place to work?

    Is your workplace a fair place to work?

    THE fairplace Award® COMES TO  SOCIAL VALUE UK

    What effect does the management of your workplace have on you, your colleagues and on all the other people in the building–including  contractors’ staff you may never see? What positive contribution does your workplace make to the local community and the planet? What does your workplace say about your company’s values and ethics?  So is your workplace a fair place to work?

    Newest Social Value UK organisational member the Ethical Property Foundation is a registered UK charity dedicated to promoting its vision that buildings should be managed for the benefit of people and planet, not just profit.The Foundation’s  accreditation the fairplace Award® has been developed in partnership with the property industry, civil society and CSR profession. It is a rigorous transformational process which evidences an organisation’s commitment to people in the workplace, the community outside its front doors and the environment, in a single comprehensive measure of excellence. Each Award lasts 3 years, assessed by top property professionals and providing recommendations for improvement.

    The fairplace Award® is also a great business improvement tool, because it  brings together colleagues from across the business, gathering evidence and sharing ideas. Current award-holders include the workplaces of RICS, Sodexo, RBS, EMCOR UK and leading aid charity CAFOD.

    It’s a tranformatonal process, Fairplace is the opposite of a box ticking exercise – to gain the award you need to look carefully at actual on the ground practices, not just policies. We have all learned a lot at RBS. We’d recommend any business to go for fairplace.”
    Mike Lynch, Sustainable Workplaces department at RBS

    Now for the good news. The Ethical Property Foundation is offering a 25% reduction on fairplace Award® licence fees to all current Social Value UK member and associates who apply for their work place before 1 July 2018.   

    The Ethical Property Foundation is delighted to be part of Social Value UK and wants to hear from you –  kindred spirits who already understand the power and potential of social value for your business. The fairplace process helps you capture how you create this in your workplace – and indeed by encouraging your suppliers to apply for fairplace too, you can ensure they are also offering their people a fair place to work. More good news is that all fairplace income is ploughed back into the Foundation’s charitable work: supplying free property education and advice to local small voluntary groups. To date the Ethical Property Foundation has supported 3500+ organisations and is currently sole referral partner to the Charity Commission for land & property advice.

    So, put your workplace ethics to the test and apply for your fairplace Award® today!  For more information contact mail@ethicalproperty.org.uk. Full details on the website www.fairplaceaward.com

     

    Press Contacts

    Ethical Property Foundation

    mail@ethicalproperty.org.u

    Social Value UK

    Christina Berry-Moorcroft, Membership and Communications Coordinator, Social Value UK

    E: christina.moorcroft@sv-test.wp-support.team                       T: 0151 703 9229

    About Ethical Property Foundation

    The Foundation works specifically to empower charities and community groups to make the most of the property they occupy and manage, and to improve the environmental and social performance of the commercial property sector. The Foundation is part of the wider Ethical Property Family which includes the Ethical Property Company and Ethical Property Europe. The Ethical Property family is committed to making the best use of property for society and the environment. We work to define what Ethical Property means, to demonstrate it in action and inspire others to put it into practice.

    About Social Value UK

    Social Value UK is the national network for anyone interested in social value and social impact. We work with our members to increase the accounting, measuring and maximising of social value from the perspective of those affected by an organisation’s activities, through our Social Value Principles. We believe in a world where a broader definition of value will change decision making and ultimately decrease inequality and environmental degradation. To achieve our mission, Social Value UK provides training and assurance services, as well as hosting regular meetings and events, creating new tools and resources, and running campaigns. Through supporting and working with our members, and as a National Member Network of Social Value International, we are creating an international movement for change.

  • Social Value Videos

    Social Value Videos

    Social value is the quantification of the relative importance that people place on the changes they experience in their lives. Some, but not all of this value is captured in market prices. It is important to consider and measure this social value from the perspective of those affected by an organisation’s work. Examples of social value might be the value we experience from increasing our confidence, or from living next to a community park. These things are important to us, but are not commonly expressed or measured in the same way that financial value is. At Social Value UK, we believe that social value has a huge potential to help us change the way we understand the world around us, and make decisions about where to invest resources. By changing the way we account for value, we believe that we will end up with a world with more equality and a more sustainable environment.

    Recently we have began sharing interesting and inspiring talks and presentations that relate to the Principles of Social Value, and our mission to improve equality and reduce environmental degradation. These videos span interests, sectors and topics but they’re all under 20 minutes and should be added to your “to watch” list. We have been sharing these videos on Twitter using the hashtag #socvalvid and will continue to do so in the weeks to come, so keep an eye out each Monday and Friday! Please search the hashtag for an enjoyable and informative afternoon distraction and share your own finds using #socvalvid.

    We have included a talk to get you started below, let us know your thoughts in the comments.

    You might not expect the chief operating officer of a major global corporation to look too far beyond either the balance sheet or the bottom line. But Harish Manwani, COO of Unilever, makes a passionate argument that doing so to include value, purpose and sustainability in top-level decision-making is not just savvy, it’s the only way to run a 21st century business responsibly.

  • Social Value Matters 2017

    Social Value Matters 2017

     

    Today Ben Carpenter, Operations Manager, Social Value UK shares updates from Social Value Matters 2017.

    On the 10th-11th April Social Value International (SVI) teamed up with Turkish member Koç University Social Impact Forum (KUSIF) to deliver their annual conference; “Social Value Matters” in Istanbul. This year the conference title Social Value Matters (SVM17) carried the tag line “More Than Ever”. The backdrop being a world with rising inequality and a collective feeling that we must all act now and quickly to reverse this trend. The conference had a distinct emphasis on Maximising Social Value and Amplifying Stakeholder Voices; empowering the views of the vulnerable – the very people that many of us are providing service or products for. How can we make sure that we are maximising the value we create for these people? I was delighted to see that these themes ran deeply through all the sessions I attended.

    This was the third SVI conference I have attended and each one leaves me feeling motivated and inspired. They bring together talented professionals from diverse spheres – united in their desire to see social impact information being used to inform decision making and make the world a better place. SVM17 was no exception; over 250 delegates came from over 25 countries representing the public sector, private sector, academia and civil society. Cross cutting these sectors there were investors, delivery organisations and advisors. Throw in the stunning setting of Koç University overlooking the banks of the Bosphorus and it’s a heady mix.

     “It’s great to have so many people from all over the world working together to improve the way in which managing impact can reduce inequality.”

    Jeremy Nicholls, CEO Social Value UK and Social Value International

    The format of Social Value Matters was extremely participatory – there were no lectures or ‘expert panels’, instead there was always several workshop options, interactive in their delivery and the majority of the conference consisted of small roundtable discussions. Plenary sessions were kept to a minimum with high quality keynote speeches to start both days and then delegates taking to the stage with an open mic session to reflect and summarise at the close of each day (with a live jazz sound-track too!). You can check out some conference highlights and the conversations attendees were having on social media on this STORIFY.

     

    What I personally learned from the conference?

    The one thing that struck me was that, we should all (regularly) take a step back and ask ourselves why we are collecting this information about social value in the first place? The answer is surely: “So that we can maximise the social value we create”. So, rather than focussing on the measurement of impact as an exercise in itself – and getting caught up in the complexities of ‘empirical evidence’ or ‘formative evaluation’ – we should focus on collecting the information we need to improve our products and services. Or, in the case of investors/governance; “Is that organisation collecting the information it needs to improve it’s products or services?”

    I have written before about an emerging shift from impact measurement to maximising impact. This conference reaffirmed that it is definitely time to stop nit-picking about methodologies or metrics. More important is creating an organisational culture of listening to stakeholders and responding which means designing services or products to meet their preferences. This involves all of the complex and geeky things we love to discuss and are necessary to practice (such as stakeholder involvement, valuation techniques, counterfactual, materiality) but doing it proportionately and with a clear raison d’etre: to maximise the social value of our activities.

    As our conversations shift more towards ‘managing impact’ and ‘maximising value’ there are more references to subjects such as ‘design thinking’, ‘social innovation’ and ‘customer profiling techniques’. These are exciting topics and practices – arguably more exciting than ‘measurement’ and ‘accounting’ (but ssshh don’t tell the accountants I said that!). The truth is, accountability and maximising value are two sides of the same coin; if you are being accountable to your stakeholders then you are relentlessly innovating to provide the best services for them. I can’t wait to bring in more experts from these fields to help develop our movement!

    What happens next, ACTIONS?

    • SVI will soon be publishing some write-ups of all workshops and roundtables, many of which have some clear actions for the community moving forward.
    • We will be analysing feedback from the conference that will give us a NPS and some qualitative data on what impact the conference has had on attendees!
    • SVI will be launching a campaign for maximising value, which was also a need highlighted by SVI’s annual survey
    • The turkish chapter of Social Value International was officially launched at the conference and we expect more national networks to emerge or continue to grow. If you would like to join a national network or form one please contact SVI.

    We hope all attendees and also people who couldn’t attend can stay in touch using Social Value International social media.

    Join the movement, by becoming a member today, and see you next year!

  • Trafford Housing Trust’s Tom Wilde honoured for commitment to social value

    Trafford Housing Trust’s Tom Wilde honoured for commitment to social value

    Tom Wilde, Trafford Housing Trust’s Social Value Advisor and Social Value UK member, has been honoured for his commitment to serving the local community at the Social Value Awards. The Social Value Awards, in association with Department for Culture, Media and Sport, took place at London’s Institute of Engineering Technology on Wednesday 8th February and provided an opportunity to celebrate good practice in commissioning and providing social value. The awards relate to the 2012 Social Value Act, which called for all public sector bodies to consider social, economic and environmental benefits to local communities, rather than just cost, when awarding contracts to public services.

    At the ceremony, Tom took home one of the four available prizes on the night, winning the Social Value Leadership Award for an Individual, a category which recognises the work of someone in an organisation that goes beyond the requirements of the Social Value Act, and who is instrumental in leading and engaging others in social value. Tom was up against two other nominees for the award, Brian Bishop from Data Performance Consultancy Ltd. and Cindy Nadesan from Surrey and East Sussex Council.

    It’s amazing to get national recognition for a job that I truly love doing. I’m really lucky to work for an organisation that believes in social value enough that they have created a full-time position that focuses on it.

    Tom’s award was in honour of his work analysing local needs to understand what support or interventions will deliver greatest social value within Trafford, and his key role in the re-design of the Trust’s procurement processes which ensured social value is embedded through the supply chain. Tom has also played a key role in supporting local businesses to align their CSR and social value activities more closely with the projects and organisations which will deliver greatest local impact while also leveraging support from local partners and businesses to address local needs.

    Tom said: “It’s amazing to get national recognition for a job that I truly love doing. I’m really lucky to work for an organisation that believes in social value enough that they have created a full-time position that focuses on it. Getting this award will increase the Trust’s profile as an organisation that champions social value, which in turn will open doors to work with and influence others and spread social value beyond the public sector.”

    Matthew Gardiner, chief executive of Trafford Housing Trust, added: “Tom is fully deserving of this award and it is fitting recognition of the excellent work he has undertaken since joining the Trust. The Trust has long been a champion of the importance of social value, as evidenced by our social enterprise CleanStart, and Tom’s award is further proof that the Trust is at the forefront of public bodies that are committed to awarding contracts that result in positive social outcomes as well as excellent results.”

    The award ceremony was the climax of the fourth annual Social Value Summit, the leading event in its field, attracting over 300 leaders from across the private, public and social sectors. It is organised by Social Enterprise UK and Interserve, supported by Business in the Community.

  • The Seven Principles of Maximising Social Value

    The Seven Principles of Maximising Social Value

    This month we published a new report “The Seven Principles of Social Value, and why they are important for accountability and maximising social value”, that is available for free on our online resource library.

    Social Value is the value that stakeholders experience through changes in their lives. Some, but not all of this value is captured in market prices.

    The Principles of Social Value provide the basic building blocks for anyone who wants to make decisions that take this wider definition of value into account, in order to increase equality, improve well being and increase environmental sustainability. They are generally accepted social accounting principles.

    The Principles are not individually remarkable; they have been drawn from principles underlying social accounting and audit, sustainability reporting, cost benefit analysis, financial accounting, and evaluation practice. There are other guides available on the process of measuring and reporting social value and impact that also refer to principles, such as the Social Investment Taskforce Guidelines for Good Impact Practice. However, the Principles of Social Value can be distinguished by their focus on what underpins an account of social value, and on the questions that need to be addressed so that the information can be used to better inform decisions.

    The Principles were originally developed in 2009 and were updated in 2015 following the merger of the SROI Network and the Social Impact Analysts Association. This new report from Social Value UK explains the thinking that underpins these Principles.

    Please read the report here and let us know what you think in the comments section.

  • The SROI Network response to Social Value Act Review

    The SROI Network response to Social Value Act Review

    On the 13th February, Lord Young released the much anticipated review of the Social Value Act. The growing interest in social value, what it is and how we can produce more of it, is encouraging and a revision to the Act is a great opportunity to make this easier for commissioners whilst ensuring that local communities are really benefiting. More social value is being created than before.

    And so it was a disappointment that the Act has not yet been extended to include goods and works. The SROI Network’s aim is to change the way the world accounts for value, across the board. Incorporating social value into all procurement decisions is a natural step.

    One of the issues raised by Lord Young before the Act can be extended or given more statutory permissions is measurement. As stated in the report, ‘whilst potential bidders are able to articulate the social outcomes they will provide, there is a lack of consistency and rigour around how these outcomes are quantified. This can make it harder for procurement officers to be reasonably objective when they are evaluating social value bids, and make it more difficult to assess the additional value for money provided by a social value offer.’ (pg.11)

    This means that measurement of social value is not yet developed enough to provide commissioners with adequately robust measures which can be compared between bidders.

    Challenges around measurement and clarity of definition of social value will of course contribute to a lack of take-up and inconsistent practice. As Hazel Blears said in Hansard in September of last year, “This is a plea to the Minister: we have to have consistent principles and grounds for the measurement of value”[1].

    It is this consistency in the principles, rather than indicators or values that will enable different values to be compared between each other, and decisions to be made on this basis. That is why we have had a set of seven core, consistent principles that lie at the heart of SROI. This enables different types of value to be measured in the same way, according to the same principles of best practice, but suitable for different levels of rigour, depending on the organisation’s purpose.

    It is also important that we do not lose sight of the linkages with the public sector’s existing approaches to thinking about value, for example through the need to ensure value for money, cost benefit analysis, and business case requirements to support expenditure programmes.

    The National Audit Office defines Value for Money as ‘the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes’. We would want to be clear that assessing value for money must also take account of non-intended outcomes. However if the focus is on outcomes, and these have been determined with the involvement of those who will be affected by commissioning decisions, then social value will be aligned with value for money.

    The Business Case, specifically the Five Case Model, is designed to ensure public value is being achieved through spending decisions. Again there is a strong relationship between social value and public value.

    The challenge is to make the approach to measurement appropriate for commissioning decisions, whilst remaining consistent with existing requirements. As the measurement of social value develops and helps commissioners make choices between bidders, the SROI Network would recommend that our principles are used as the basis which will contribute to comparability without falling into the trap of pre-determined lists of indicators that are thought to represent all the important sources of social value. The Treasury were part of the steering group that resulted in the Guide to SROI and its principles and we would recommend therefore that the NAO and Treasury are closely involved in developments.

    For more information on our SROI principles, you can download our Guide to SROI or our 2-page principles document.

    We also hope to contribute to an increase in social value commissioning and creation through our Social Value Commissioning site, with its database of case studies and resource documents. We were also happy to note that the Guide and our SROI Self Assessment Tool are both referenced in the report as useful sources of more information.

    Useful links:

    Download and read the full report here


    [1] Hansard, 2nd September 2014: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm140902/halltext/140902h0001.htm

  • Common Questions in Commissioning Social Value

    Common Questions in Commissioning Social Value

    Common Questions in Commissioning Social Value

    October 2013Questions

    Jeremy Nicholls, CEO of The SROI Network alongside Joelle Bradly, Research Manager at Leicestershire County Council and Jenni Inglis, Director of VIE have come together to try and answer some of the most common questions they have encountered regarding commissioning and social value.

    1 What is social value?

    Social value relates to changes (outcomes) experienced by people and the environment, much of which is currently not captured in financial transactions. However the outcomes of activities and services are experienced by a range of people and are all of different levels of importance. Social value is an expression of changes that occur and the relative importance of these outcomes to those experiencing them. Social value will be being created through existing expenditure.

    2 How can we secure more social value?

    There are many ways in which more social value can be secured. A great starting point is to understand the outcomes desired by communities and prioritising them according to their relative importance. When you consider what you might do to achieve these outcomes, forecasting the likely effects and reflecting their relative importance will help to choose the best solution. Lastly, when activities are being delivered, checking what the social value of the solution actually is can help to inform future commissioning. If you understand what these outcomes are and how these outcomes are delivered you can then commission based on the activities and outcomes that create maximum value. This can be many things – ranging from employment opportunities through to reducing social isolation. It is very difficult to be prescriptive in advance.

    3 Why is social value important to us?

    One of the purposes of the public sector, and a duty for some public bodies, is to achieve best value, or in other words continuous improvement in economy, efficiency and effectiveness. Assessment of ‘economy’ has not always questioned what need there really was at the start and too often assessment of ‘effectiveness’ has not been able to account for the importance of the changes secured, and even sometimes what changes happened. Social value offers us a way to understand and generate real value for money. So you need to know how much social value you are getting for what you spend and, in decommissioning or redesigning services to cut costs, you need to be aware of effects on social value.

    4 When should we start thinking about social value?

    Start now. Understanding social value and acting to secure more of it will require:
    • better systems to understand and prioritise desired outcomes together with communities,
    • the involvement of communities and suppliers in developing solutions and a broader assessment of value in options appraisal and
    • changes to delivery mechanisms (whether staff roles or contracts for example).
    • encouraging potential providers to think about the social value they may be creating for different groups through existing solutions and how they can measure and value it.

    5 Can social value be quantified?

    It can but there are three questions that need answering.
    • What are the relevant and most significant outcomes for those affected?
    • How are these measured?
    • How important are they to the people that experienced them?
    So outcomes can be measured and weightings can be given to the quantities of outcomes to express social value.

    6 Why can’t we just let providers tell us what their social value is?

    Avoid the risk, appealing through it may be, of adding a box to the tender for providers to tell you their ‘added social value’. It will be impossible to score fairly. Involve providers earlier on in generating ideas on how to create the most value so that it can be built into the specification.

    7 Why can’t we just decide a list of things we think are the most important types of social value for our area and add these to tenders?

    There is a risk that the things on your list may have limited relevance to the subject matter of the service specification, which may make your procurement process more open to legal challenge. Restricting what is and isn’t social value also runs the risk of missing significant opportunities for securing more value. If you involve providers prior to sourcing your solution you can better understand what they might deliver and better specify social value requirements.

    8 Why can’t we just commission against last year’s strategy?

    You should not make decisions without a thorough understanding of the needs and aspiration of your residents and stakeholders and how much they value outcomes. Such an understanding enables a weighting to be applied to different outcomes for different stakeholder groups. Without a way of prioritising intended outcomes it is difficult to know where effort should be focussed and could lead to commissioning the wrong things based merely on what has been done before.

    9 Is social value always positive?

    No it isn’t always; activities can both create and destroy value. Recognise this when anticipating the likely results of a course of action and when evaluating the actual results, so that where negative effects occur and social value is being lost they can be reduced or avoided altogether.

    10 Who decides the value? Is there a standardised list of social values?

    Social value can only be better understood through recognising the relative value of different outcomes experienced by people and the environment. Encourage decision makers to develop an understanding of relative value from the perspective of those affected and how this differs between groups. An off-the-shelf list of values is not always appropriate but a standardised approach to determining how to value them may be helpful.

    11 Can this help me identify cashable savings?

    Some social value can help free up resources depending on the priorities that your needs analysis arrives at. The extent to which these changes can lead to reductions in budgets depends on scale, business models, latent demand in the system and political decisions. Reporting on how your costs vary with scale helps inform these decisions. Identify the potential for, and difference between, cashable saving, resource savings, or reallocation of resources in advance.

    12 Can social value help us work across departments?

    Social value doesn’t work in silos. Many opportunities for increasing social value will come from commissioning outcomes that are managed by different departments. Understanding the value to other departments can also prompt and inform conversations around funding decisions if there is evidence of the benefits to them.

    13 Will smaller providers deliver more if we take more account of social value?

    Creating the most social value requires organisations to understand the holistic needs, assets and aspirations of the people they are working directly with and the communities they inhabit. Smaller organisations are often good at doing this but they can be excluded for financial risk reasons, or because of a belief in economies of scale. You should manage financial risk at a corporate level and allow increased financial risk in some areas so that organisations that may create more social value are not excluded before they start. You should also consider how you package work and how this may increase your options. You can also use the small lots concession to enable participation by SMEs in any large, homogenous, requirement. Smaller organisations may be good at delivery but may not have capacity to manage and analyse data on needs and outcomes. Consider how you can support them. For example, smaller organisations may have the capacity to collate social value information but not analyse it.

    14 Do we really need to speak to people?

    Social value is what your customers and residents want. They can tell you their needs and aspirations and how they may experience change. Different groups will have very different needs and aspirations and so you need to involve them to understand what the social value is in any given context. In exploring service options, design services with them and others affected.

    15 When should social value be measured?

    Social value may be created during delivery of a service, may persist after the service has stopped and the most significant social value may occur after the service has been provided. Contract management and information on when outcomes occur and how long they last will be critical for ensuring the social value is actually created and understood. If you want to know if your services are improving social value you will need to know how much you are creating at the moment. You need a baseline.

    16 How can we embed practices to secure more social value in commissioning?

    In order to embed an approach to maximising social value in commissioning you will need to further build on skills in a wide range of existing functions. For example listening to and asking open questions of a wide range of different people, collecting this data and identifying patterns and analysing relationships between activities and outcomes, and involving people in generating options. You may need to shift the emphasis in how you commission to consider value across organisational boundaries, to spend more time on gaining insight from needs analysis or to do more comprehensive options appraisals. You will need to nurture a shared understanding across staff levels and departments and this will take leadership. Make sure that appraisal of staff takes all these tips into consideration.

    If you have any questions or comments on this article please email info@thesroinetwork.org